Computer Science & Software Engineering
Likert Review
Overview
The purpose of this evaluation is to improve future instruction by identifying strengths, key takeaways, and opportunities for growth. Each category includes three structured sentences and a value rating on a scale of 1–5. Pick one category, try a different category each lesson.
-
Presentation - Statements evaluating the group’s clarity, knowledge, engagement, and organization.
-
Content - Notebook(s) - Statements assessing the conciseness, informativeness, use of examples, effectiveness of hacks, and relevance of the content.
-
Takeaways - Statements capturing the overall value of the presentation and the perceived ability to apply what was learned.
Lesson Evaluation
The microblog comment allows for immediate feedback and reply from lesson team to request clarity. Additionally, these tracking elements are captured in microblog automatically.
- Lesson Topic:
- Teaching Group:
- Date:
Evaluation Criteria
Complete this evaluation immediately after the lesson as a single group response.
- Sentence 1 is a positive/pro comment
- Sentence 2 is a content comment, a key growth from the category.
- Sentence 3 is a constructive/grow comment.
- Rating is a 1 to 5 on value (1-poor, 2-lacking, 3-Okay, 4-interesting, 5-informative)
| Category | Sentence 1 – Positive | Sentence 2 – Key Takeaway | Sentence 3 – Grow | Rating (1–5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation | ||||
| Content – Notebook(s) | ||||
| Takeaways |
Additional Prompt (Optional)
- What should this group keep doing in future lessons?
- What is one improvement that would most increase learning value?
Rating Scale (Instructional Value)
- 1 – Poor: Unclear or unhelpful
- 2 – Lacking: Some effort, limited understanding gained
- 3 – Okay: Adequate but not memorable
- 4 – Interesting: Clear and useful
- 5 – Informative: Strong understanding and confidence gained